<< /Pg 17 0 R << << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 29 0 R /K 3 /K 0 endobj /S /P 1 0 obj << /P 12 0 R endobj /K 5 << /P 506 0 R << /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> United States v. Prantil, 764 F.2d 548, 551 (9th Cir. << << endobj /P 12 0 R 31 0 obj << /Pg 20 0 R 3. /S /P /Contents [441 0 R 442 0 R 443 0 R] /P 506 0 R 20 [142 0 R 143 0 R] >> endobj /K 6 /P 509 0 R << 8. endobj >> /S /Link /K [13 311 0 R 15] In 3/19, C.H. endobj /S /P << /P 56 0 R /P 12 0 R >> /Count 5 /Pg 18 0 R /S /P /Lang (EN-US) << >> /K 12 << /K 32 An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. >> /S /P /S /P Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. /ModDate (D:20190627090514-04'00') endobj 180 0 obj United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. 0000002183 00000 n
351 0 obj endobj She must asker lawyer. 205 0 obj endobj 196 0 obj endobj /Pg 45 0 R /K 0 /Pg 15 0 R /Lang (EN-US) citation to the law supporting the request. >> You need a written motion signed by both your client and yourself, and sworn to by your client. /Pg 17 0 R Note: Summary Judgment Motions have a 30 day Response period. /Pg 44 0 R /P 123 0 R << /Pg 45 0 R /P 81 0 R 337 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] 248 0 obj 121 0 obj endobj >> /S /P /Rotate 0 /Pg 29 0 R << Background "Florida courts have held that disqualification of counsel "is an extraordinary remedy and should only be resorted to sparingly." (Manning v. Cooper (2008) 981 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Alexander v. 11 [110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R] >> /P 12 0 R Please click Confirm below to continue. 93 0 obj >> /S /P /StructParents 22 RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC for Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al :: Justia Dockets & Filings Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit Arizona District Court Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 Xcentric Ventures, LLC et al v. Stanley et al Filing 39 ________________________ United States District Judge. /K [9 309 0 R 11] /Superscript /Span endobj /P 508 0 R /K 13 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 269 0 obj /Tabs /S 0000006178 00000 n
endobj The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. /S /P << Judicial Disqualification: What Every Practitioner (and Judge) Should Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) << >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 17 0 R He then filed a Motion for Discovery on January 29, 2002, and a Motion for Evidentiary Hearing on February 1, 2002. 159 0 obj endobj 264 0 obj >> /P 12 0 R Judge Denies 2nd Motion To Nix Plaintiff Attorney In Abandoned Wells /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Contents [445 0 R 446 0 R 447 0 R] /K 39 253 0 R 254 0 R 255 0 R 256 0 R 257 0 R 258 0 R 259 0 R 260 0 R 261 0 R 262 0 R << /K 3 trailer /Lang (EN-US) /K 14 . In this case, the defendant has failed to demonstrate a compelling need for the prosecutors' testimony or that the information sought cannot be obtained from an alternative source. /K 22 /Lang (EN-US) >> >> /P 12 0 R /K 23 /K [22 285 0 R 24] /P 276 0 R 327 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) << PDF 1. Identity of Moving Party 2. Statement of Relief Sought - Washington /P 531 0 R endobj endobj 115 0 obj 166 0 obj endobj endobj /K [58 303 0 R 60] PDF Motions to Disqualify Judges for Bias or Prejudice /Annots [] 75 0 obj << /S /P /P 55 0 R << /Annots [] /S /P /K [8 510 0 R] /K 23 /S /Reference Attorneys should be aware, however, that clients can make a successful case for disqualifying attorneys who had a greatly invested role with the organizational client or where the playbook knowledge is uniquely and particularly relevant to the new representation. /P 505 0 R << Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing 191 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) << >> /Pg 15 0 R << /Pg 15 0 R superceded, 764 F.2d 548 (9th Cir. Courts differ on how they address motions to disqualify, especially because such motions are at times simply a litigation tactic by an opposing party in search of a strategic advantage. /P 4 0 R endobj /K [7 313 0 R 9] endobj /Pg 19 0 R << /Pg 17 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) 308 0 obj /K [322 0 R 324 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 26 0 R endobj /Tabs /S /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /K 0 For the reasons stated below, Petitioner's Motion to Disqualify Counsel . 174 0 obj 187 0 obj /K 15 /Tabs /S /P 528 0 R /Pg 44 0 R /K 2 << /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) Here, Tenorio complied with LR 7-2(g) by filing a motion for leave to file supplemental authorities rather than filing a notice of supplemental authorities. 172 0 obj /Pg 19 0 R 360 0 obj People v. Nozolino, 298 P.3d 915, 919 (Colo. 2013) (Disqualification of a partys chosen attorney is an extreme remedy and is only appropriate where required to preserve the integrity and fairness of the judicial proceedings.) (citation omitted). endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 24 0 R >> /P 509 0 R 44 0 obj /K 30 /Annots [] /Pg 22 0 R /K 38 /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Pages << A motion is usually made in writing. 1. endobj RESPONSE TO MOTION TO DISQUALIFY ATTORNEY DREW MAZZEO By: Drew Mazzeo Bauer Pitman Snyder Huff Lifetime Legal, PLLC 1235 4th Ave E #200 Olympia, WA 98506 (360) 754-1976 dpm@lifetime.legal Attorney for Petitioner FILED SUPREME COURT STATE OF WASHINGTON 1012212019 8 :00 AM BY SUSAN L. CARLSON CLERK /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Underline /Span /S /H3 /Tabs /S /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 22 0 R << /K 6 << /Parent 10 0 R << /Pg 16 0 R /S /TOCI /K 2 /Pg 19 0 R endobj /S /TOCI /S /P 211 0 obj /S /P /Parent 10 0 R endobj endobj endobj /K 10 Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. /K [54 301 0 R 56] /S /P 67 0 obj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 271 0 obj /K 37 In fact, the plaintiff's attorney conceded in open court, "I can honestly state I am not completely pre-pared to respond to the motion for summa-ry judgment." The judge, however, allowed the plaintiff to submit a brief on the . /K [0 319 0 R 13 320 0 R 15 321 0 R 17] /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] endobj << endobj /Lang (EN-US) PDF Attorney for Petitioner - Washington State Courts Washington Courts (Att. /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 26 0 R 2 [54 0 R null 274 0 R 275 0 R 274 0 R null 276 0 R 277 0 R 276 0 R null /P 12 0 R /K [10 279 0 R 12] << 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R 202 0 R] /Lang (EN-US) >> 13 0 obj Colorado Judicial Branch - Self Help - Forms - Miscellaneous General Use endobj Upon consideration of the defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. at 391; United States v. Wallach, 788 F. Supp. 6 0 obj Where a conflict exists, an effective written consent is the best defense to a motion to disqualify. /Parent 11 0 R /S /Footnote 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] 15 316 0 R 16 [127 0 R 128 0 R 129 0 R 130 0 R 131 0 R] 359 0 obj << /Type /Page endobj endobj 13. /Pg 17 0 R /Pg 20 0 R /Pg 24 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 80 0 obj /Parent 9 0 R endobj Mealey's (February 27, 2023, 2:08 PM EST) -- WHEELING, W.Va. A federal judge in West Virginia denied a hydraulic fracturing company's second attempt to disqualify the counsel for landowners in a dispute over abandoned wells, ruling that there is no ethical violation on the part of the fracking operator's former employee Bryan "Wayne . endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P endobj /K 10 /Pg 15 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /K 2 << As another court has observed "[t]he law does not liberally permit a defendant to call a prosecutor as a witness. Serve the other party . endstream
endobj
234 0 obj
<. /S /P 356 0 obj << /Kids [30 0 R 31 0 R 32 0 R 33 0 R 34 0 R] /Pg 35 0 R << /Parent 7 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 240 0 obj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) Woodard v. Dist. >> /Pg 16 0 R 163 0 obj >> << /S /P /Rotate 0 /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 27 << /K [0 325 0 R 13] /S /P /Rotate 0 /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /Rotate 0 endobj 61 0 obj 12-1]. 10. /P 12 0 R However, as cited in Respondents' brief, there are specific provisions of the Washington constitution, state statutes, and case law regarding representation of the Insurance /K 1 PDF state of maryland 177 0 R 178 0 R 179 0 R 180 0 R 181 0 R 182 0 R 183 0 R 184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R /Lang (EN-US) >> /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) >> /Lang (EN-US) /Annots [] _______________/s/_______________ MARK R. ROSMAN Attorney-in-Charge Florida State Bar No. /Contents [392 0 R 393 0 R 394 0 R] 164 0 obj endobj /S /H3 /S /TOCI /Lang (EN-US) >> /Type /Page 147 0 R 148 0 R 149 0 R 150 0 R 151 0 R 152 0 R 153 0 R 154 0 R 155 0 R 156 0 R /Pg 41 0 R Rule 2.330 (e). >> /S /P /S /TOCI /S /P /P 12 0 R /StructParents 3 247 0 obj /K 29 251 0 obj If you are not already a client of Dentons, please do not send us any confidential information. 10-0101 San Francisco, CA 94102-3478 (415) 436-6660 (415) 436-6683 (Fax) Attorneys for Plaintiff the United States of America Also filed on behalf of 10 Plaintiff States (See signature block) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION /P 508 0 R /P 304 0 R >> PDF FLORIDA JUDICIAL QUALIFICATIONS COMMISSldN - Supreme Court of Florida /Tabs /S 309 0 obj 102 0 obj 98 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /S /P /Type /Page >> /S /P /Pg 16 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /Filter /FlateDecode 64 0 obj >> /P 505 0 R /Rotate 0 /Pg 29 0 R 107 0 obj << /Lang (EN-US) 0000006588 00000 n
/P 12 0 R << Affidavit to Disqualify or Recuse Judge for Prejudice - US Legal Forms << >> /S /P /Resources 371 0 R Attempting to defeat the motion without advising the client is not an acceptable solution. << /S /P >> << 5. /Pg 16 0 R >> endobj 212 0 obj /S /Link /P 12 0 R /P 12 0 R Spears, 797 S.W.2d at 656; see also TEX. 310 0 obj /S /H1 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 45 0 R 87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /DropCap /Figure endobj 288 0 obj /S /P /P 508 0 R endobj /Tabs /S /S /P /S /H3 /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R Dentons - Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify /S /P 191 0 R] >> 344 0 obj endobj 207 0 obj /K 22 endobj +126:*l1%HQa7m'PfQn /S /P endobj /S /P >> >> >> /K 35 << /Type /Page endobj 324 0 R null 325 0 R 132 0 R 326 0 R 134 0 R] 347 0 obj /Annots [] /K 5 128 0 obj >> Possessing general knowledge about a client may not, by itself, be enough for disqualification. gdYBC;:::@Jht
Mkhml$Y*$&\@$#m `
D*e d!$4RLd` /ParentTreeNextKey 43 /CropBox [0 0 612 792] endobj /P 288 0 R << /Pg 43 0 R >> /K 4 /K 0 /Tabs /S /K 9 /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /K 5 21 0 obj /Pg 15 0 R 17, 2020), the Central District of California decided a motion to disqualify brought by the defendant based on two grounds: (1) a purported conflict based on plaintiff's counsel's prior employment by the defendant; and (2) plaintiff's counsel's improper receipt of information, procured 2. /Resources 486 0 R /StructParents 29 << 144 0 obj 2:11-cv-03473-CBM-MAN (Aug. 26, 2014) (motion to disqualify Squire Patton Boggs), www.law360.com/dockets/download/53fdfac81101ea655a00000b?doc_ url=https%3A%2F%2Fecf.cacd.uscourts. 343 0 obj 231 0 obj /Pg 33 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 12 0 obj << /P 508 0 R 29 0 obj << /Pg 15 0 R 45 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) 192 0 obj /Nums [0 [47 0 R 48 0 R 49 0 R 50 0 R 203 0 R 204 0 R 205 0 R 206 0 R 207 0 R 208 0 R /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /Lang (EN-US) /S /P << << /Lang (EN-US) /K 17 endobj /Pg 17 0 R In determining whether to disqualify an attorney on the ground that he or she will likely be a witness, the court is guided, but not bound by, the standards set forth in Rule 3.7, and whether to disqualify an attorney rests in the sound discretion of the Court. Attorney General . << << >> /Rotate 0 /P 286 0 R /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /K [42 295 0 R 44] >> /Pg 19 0 R /Contents [364 0 R 365 0 R 366 0 R] /P 531 0 R 0000009145 00000 n
/Pg 22 0 R According to the Colorado Supreme Court, however, a court may not disqualify counsel on the basis of speculation or conjecture.. >> 10 filed 06/26/19 PageID.515 Page 2 of 32 /K 3 << << /Contents [467 0 R 468 0 R 469 0 R] 0000009036 00000 n
/S /P endobj 335 0 obj >> /S /P /Tabs /S /Tabs /S /S /P /P 508 0 R /S /P /K 9 /Contents [487 0 R 488 0 R 489 0 R] 114 0 obj 238 0 obj << >> /P 55 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << . /S /P Rule 4-1.6 provides that, except in limited circumstances, "a lawyer shall not reveal information relating to representation of a client. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 0000000016 00000 n
>> >> /Pg 36 0 R The Motion Clerk shall enter the "Answer" or "Response" Date on the Cover Sheet. endobj /P 12 0 R << << /K 1 disqualify Attorney Burt; and (3) plaintiff's motion to disqualify Attorneys Will and Wyatt. /S /P /Parent 8 0 R /S /H3 /K 9 /P 12 0 R /K 10 endobj endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> endobj /P 507 0 R endobj << >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 15 0 R /P 12 0 R /Rotate 0 >> at 390-91. /S /P 193 0 obj endobj 28 0 obj >> /S /P << 133 0 obj /Pg 20 0 R /K 16 /K 1 << 236 0 obj 28 [169 0 R 170 0 R] /S /P /K 7 /P 12 0 R 183 0 obj << /S /P /K 11 As the motion describes, the purpose of the Compensation Pilot is to address a financial PDF Seeking a Recusal - Starnes Law (quoting People ex rel. /P 12 0 R << /Pg 22 0 R /P 12 0 R /StructParents 1 endobj 288 0 R 289 0 R 288 0 R null 290 0 R 291 0 R 290 0 R null 292 0 R 293 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /P 12 0 R MOTIONS DISQUALIFY LITIGATION - State Bar of Texas /P 529 0 R /S /P /S /P /StructParents 33 1, WSBA Public Information on Mary Ann Strickler). endobj /Pg 19 0 R /K 43 /P 531 0 R endobj 17 0 obj endobj /S /P /Annots [] 101 0 obj /K [6 323 0 R 8] endobj /Kids [35 0 R 36 0 R 37 0 R 38 0 R 39 0 R] /S /P 3. /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) %%EOF
/P 12 0 R /K 2 /S /P endobj /K 0 /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj << << /Pg 19 0 R /K 2 /Tabs /S /Pg 43 0 R endobj endobj By letter dated June 10, 1997, the defendant made a demand pursuant to 28 C.F.R. << /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /S /TOCI /Length 532 0 R /Resources 482 0 R endobj << /StructParents 34 >> /K 18 /Pg 19 0 R /S /TOCI << 182 0 obj >> /Pg 37 0 R /K 0 /S /P endobj >> << /Pg 44 0 R /P 292 0 R /Lang (EN-US) endobj /K 6 /Rotate 0 /S /P /S /P endobj << /K 39 124 0 obj /P 528 0 R >> >> << /P 12 0 R /S /P /Count 5 in writing. <> << /P 55 0 R unless the client consents after disclosure to the . /Lang (EN-US) >> /P 508 0 R /K 4 /Type /Page /Rotate 0 /P 505 0 R /K 19 /P 508 0 R All Responses to Motions and Answers to Petitions must be filed with the Office of Judicial Records and submitted to the Motion Clerk on or before the Response Date. /Tabs /S /K [8 525 0 R] Response to Motion to Disqualify Counsel and Law Firm [Doc. /K 3 /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /K 2 /K 10 /K 0 /P 505 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 14 << >> >> /Pg 34 0 R << You are switching to another language. /Lang /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 17 0 R 294 0 obj /P 506 0 R Unsolicited emails and other information sent to Dentons will not be considered confidential, may be disclosed to others, may not receive a response, and do not create a lawyer-client relationship. endobj /P 278 0 R /K 1 << /Parent 3 0 R >> 12] and Memorandum in Support [Doc. /Pg 17 0 R endobj /Pg 30 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 438 0 obj >> << /K 7 /P 55 0 R endobj /Pg 17 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> 524, 528 (D.Colo. << 255 0 obj
<>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9A3F555EF45C79488712E0D1EABAE832>]/Index[233 34]/Info 232 0 R/Length 107/Prev 253809/Root 234 0 R/Size 267/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream
endobj 33 [184 0 R 185 0 R 186 0 R 187 0 R 188 0 R 332 0 R 333 0 R 334 0 R 335 0 R 336 0 R /K 0 35 [192 0 R 193 0 R 194 0 R 195 0 R 196 0 R 197 0 R 198 0 R 199 0 R 200 0 R 201 0 R Such motions are sometimes followed by either a grievance or a legal malpractice claim. 58 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 33 0 R are satisfied. Prohibition is used as the justification for allowing judges to rule on their own motions to disqualify, as attorneys are given another means to have a judge disqualified. /K 17 /K 9 >> Motion to Disqualify Trial Judge: - Thomas M. Bates /S /Sect /Lang (EN-US) Increasingly, courts nationwide have recognized and accepted timely, effective ethics screens as a positive factor for permitting an attorney to continue the representation, although sometimes a screen is not enough to avoid the ramifications of an imputed conflict. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] << 16.21 et seq. 146 0 obj endobj /K [10 314 0 R 12] 856 F. Supp. << >> /Contents [408 0 R 409 0 R 410 0 R] 194 0 obj 284 0 obj /Pg 16 0 R /Pg 23 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /Reference /S /P /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) 0000002381 00000 n
/Lang (EN-US) endobj 148 0 obj endobj << Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations. /Lang (EN-US) /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /S /P /P 12 0 R /K 3 /P 315 0 R /Parent 3 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /S /Reference >> endobj /K 9 Defendant Brian Frost submits this response in opposition to the Motion to Disqualify filed. endobj /P 12 0 R /S /P /StructParents 35 /P 12 0 R << >> 1992) (citations omitted). Upon receiving a motion to disqualify, the attorney should promptly notify the client. >> Sample opposition to motion to vacate in California with an attorney >> /P 12 0 R motion to disqualify. >> /Contents [368 0 R 369 0 R 370 0 R] /P 508 0 R Because there are other witnesses available to testify, there is no compelling need to put the prosecuting attorneys on the stand to testify. << endobj As the prosecutors have no personal knowledge of the events prior to their meeting with the defendant, they are not material witnesses to those events and should not be called to testify. >> /Lang (EN-US) endobj >> >> /K 17 /K 11 %PDF-1.6
%
/Kids [6 0 R 7 0 R 8 0 R 9 0 R 10 0 R 11 0 R] /K 18 Defendant's Motion at 1-3. >> 602. << /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /K 6 endobj << /P 508 0 R Cal. /Pg 44 0 R 113 0 obj ; Utica Mut. by plaintiff Plaintiffs motion is unsupported by any applicable legal authority and is not . /Pg 16 0 R /Annots [] RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. endobj /P 508 0 R << /Lang (EN-US) *243 In addition, the motion was not timely. >> the entire judicial process' when deciding a motion to disqualify an attorney pursuant to K.R.P.C. /Contents [396 0 R 397 0 R 398 0 R] 177 0 obj endobj 26 [160 0 R 161 0 R 162 0 R null 327 0 R null 328 0 R null 329 0 R 162 0 R /Lang (EN-US) << /Pg 21 0 R << >> /Lang (EN-US) 69 0 obj >> /S /P /Lang (EN-US) endobj endobj /Pg 24 0 R . /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R /K 6 /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /S /P /K 5 /S /P >> << /Contents [400 0 R 401 0 R 402 0 R] >> /P 12 0 R endobj /Lang (EN-US) << endobj endobj >> When a party wants to ask an Administrative Law Judge, or "ALJ," to do or change something about their case, it is called a "motion." Examples are requesting that a date for mediation be scheduled or that two cases be combined into one hearing (called a "consolidation"). /P 12 0 R 11. << endobj endobj 30 0 obj although Comment 3 to that Rule provides some context: Matters are substantially related for purposes of this Rule if they involve the same transaction or legal dispute or if there otherwise is a substantial risk that confidential factual information as would normally have been obtained in the prior representation would materially advance the clients position in the subsequent matter. General Use: Description. 218 0 obj /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R /StructParents 11 32 0 obj /S /P /K 28 275 0 obj Conflict violations are not always the focal point for resolution of a motion to disqualify. You have to fill out at least 2 forms, maybe more, to file your opposition. 125 0 obj /K 9 /K [5 512 0 R] 0000009454 00000 n
3.7." Venters, 293 Kan. at 103. 333 0 obj 260 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /K 19 endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 97 0 R 98 0 R 99 0 R 100 0 R 101 0 R 102 0 R 103 0 R 104 0 R 105 0 R] Motion to disqualify, the law firm is taking over a week to respond to /Lang (EN-US) 1857 0 obj
<>stream
/Resources 470 0 R /P 529 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R 21 [144 0 R 145 0 R 146 0 R 147 0 R 148 0 R] R. Evid. >> /K 0 << 316 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /P 528 0 R /P 508 0 R 350 0 obj /Type /Page >> /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 10 0 obj /S /H1 /Rotate 0 /P 308 0 R >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Pg 17 0 R 277 0 obj /P 12 0 R /Pg 26 0 R /K 1 endobj northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions